4th generation warfare.........

The systems disruption that the insurgents have been employing successfully to this point, is dropping off. The US is setting up shop in thier towns and now have more intel coming in then they can process, due to that fact that the people seem re-assured that were not leaving. Attacks on the electrical grid and oil piplelines have diminished greatly. Their 4GW (4th generation warfare) tactics have, for the moment, been measurably hampered.

I would have to say that the surge seems to be working over in Iraq. There have been less (reported) car bombings. The terrorists seem to be getting more desperate in thier quest to cause chaos. This is evidenced by thier use of children to get through an allied checkpoint.

The adults in the car then fled, while the children were left in the car to die. There are no words for this. Kind of reminds me of the Palestinian mentality. Dress your kids up in mock suicide vests and REAL guns. This is nothing less than child abuse. Do these people really deserve a state? Yes there have been atrocities on both sides, but the Palestinians have proved time and time again that they are incapable of joining the civilized world. I say to the Palestinians: "What happened when Sharon pulled out of GAZA?" You claimed victory, and then looted and burned the infrastructure an buisineses and farms that were deliberately left behind for you to make a living with. Proving again that left to your own devices you are an embarassment to world civilizations everywhere.

If you think that Americans are the number 1 killers of Iraqi's think again! Americans are not the one's setting off car bombs and IED's that of which are the number 1 killers of Iraqi children! If Saddam was left in power, the killing would have been just as bad (and was just as bad). It just wasn't made public by Saddam's hold on the media. Make sense? Why would Saddam allow the coverage we're all getting now????

Trans-Texas Corridor

People,

If you happen across this blog, I consider myself fourtunate. Fortunate to let you know about the North American Union. This is a deal that Bush has sighned with the governments of Canada and Mexico. This was sighned without congressional approval and was made totally out of the scope of authority of the President. Ladies and Gentelmen, this man is so arrorgant and elietist, he has made an end-run around the authority of the citizens of this country.

I belive all of these things are out of our control unless people like the survivalist and gun owners refuse to accept it. The reason the government via the 2nd amendment gave the soverighns of this nation gun ownership rights, is so that they could take matters into thier own hands if need be. Everybody can see the effort on gun control lobbyists to disarm the Amercian population.

They seem to make the excuse that if they make gun-ownership illegal, or put more obstructions in the way, it will be harder for criminals to obtain firearms. Where is the logic in this???? Logic tells me that since most criminals don't follow the law anyway, what makes us think they would try legal means to obtain firearms? Folks, legal gun owners prevent over a million violent crimes per-year.

If a criminal has a chance to rob a house. Which one would he choose? The one with a gun in it, or the one without? Which would be easier and less riskier? I don't mean to insult your intelligence, but I belive my point is clear. If you legally own a gun, you are on the road to true independance. If someone tells you t prepare for a disaster, please don't write them off as a loony toon. People that tell you this are trying to get you to be independent. The less you depend on the governement, the less control they have over what happens to you.

Please wake up people.

Thomas Jefferson wrote:

"The [privately-owned] Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly
hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution...
if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their
currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations
that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property
until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers
conquered."

This "Central Bank" he speaks of has evolved into the Federal Reserve Bank.

The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an early attempt at an American central bank,
was abolished by President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation.

He wrote:

"The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced...are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it."


Even Andrew Jackson, who also disagreed with this concept had at least two attempts made on his life. So proud and intent on warning the future generations was he that his tombstone is inscribed with the phrase
"I killed the bank!"

It came back.

The Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics, but as Congressman Charles Lindberg Sr. warned Congress:

"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth...the invisible government by
the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized."

How can we counter this? We have been entrenched in this mess for so long that it is firmly embedded into our nation. When you vote for Governor are you voting for a Governor or the head of a corporation? That corporation being the State? I belive that with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, This country began the slow process of becoming a big incorporated entity rather than a soverign nation.

America's Test

Whoever has the basic skills of living off the land and can destroy the moral cohesion of the enemy 1st will win. This most likely will be done with psych-ops. Psychological warfare aimed at internal collapse. The enemies will sacrifice firepower for mobility and speedy deployment. As evidenced by the 2003 blackout, systems disruption can be devastating to a large economy.

Weather the disruptions/disasters were intentional or not, our enemies were watching this reaction of emergency and civil response agencies and gauging thier next moves. They watched Katrina and they saw what happens when a behiemoth power like the United States is confronted with large-scale social chaos. How local law-enforcement melted away and the prevelance of various bands of thugs ran the city streets for about a month.

Most (not all) citizens did not have the presence of mind to form neiborhood watches and sustain themselves until the government came back online. Niether did they have supplies because next to nobody plans for a disaster. Most importantly, the citizenry was not prepared. They were not armed, poised to defend, or able to access a stored food and water supply. The people suffered from a total dependency on government for all of thier needs including security. People were acting like true citizens and not soveriegn people like the founding fathers intended.

Our enemies have an extrodinary advantage over us. The have a decentralized command structure and many members don't even know who the others are. This de-centralized logistical apparatus makes it very difficult for nation states like the US to fight a shadowy enemy of terrorists. They shoot, run and hide, and then shoot again. They can rapidly deploy thier forces around the globe in minutes because the people have been in place for years and some of them don't even know who they are colaborating with, or think they are carrying out an operation for purposes totally different than what is intended. They expend minimal effort conducting systems disruption (pipeline attacks, electrical grid attacks) so that they can deprive the local population of basic services and have them blame the government for not providing it. They obtain a massive return on investment for these attacks, spending maybe a few thousand dollars on an operation that causes millions in losses.


Nations that can't face us militarily, will find other means to hurt us. Attacking US currency and flooding us with illegal immigrants to destory our society from within and bring and already strained social support structure to it's knees.

On the Horizon...

There has been talk lately on some blogs, right wing of course. This is because frankly the left wing blogs like Daily Kos don't see it as a big deal and I'm not really surprised at that.

The issue is two (2) Saudi Arabian youths boarding a school bus in Florida. They had been attending Central Florida University for 6 months studying English. By the way, I hear they teach English quite well in the Saudi Kingdom so why they were here is obviously for other reasons as well. When they boarded this school bus, one of the men had on a long trench coat with shorts and a t-shirt underneath. They were speaking in their native tongue, laughing, and acting smug toward the students on the bus by witness accounts. One man was sweating profusely probably because of the needless black trenchcoat he was wearing in the hot Florida spring weather.

Now, this alarmed the student on the bus enough for them to alert the substitute bus driver that these men weren't supposed to be on the bus. The authorities were waiting for them at the school when the bus arrived and they were charged with misdemeanors trespassing. Now people are speculating that this was a dry run for an attack on school buses and children. They just wanted to see how authorities and the potential victims would respond. I can subscribe to that theory very easily. For one, how can you not know this was a school bus and not public transportation? From taking classes for foreign languages for other industrialized countries, one of the 1st things you learn is words describing public transportation. This is because it would be valuable to a tourist or visiting student and they would be the among the typical people using these services. Now having been enrolled in English for 6 months at CFU(Central Florida University), I would think they would know the difference. Besides the fact that the bus is clearly bright yellow with big black letters on it. If they haven't learned to read those letters yet, their English prof should be fired.


But now on to the issue of possible terrorist surveillance.... If this was the case (which I think is more likely than not given the past history of investigations into matters like these), this is alarming. But I can only say this to the people that would perportrate this kind of act. The backlash against the Arab/Muslim community would be so great, it would be like nothing they have ever seen. The American public seems to let the liberal left tie them down and shame them into not speaking out about a lot of things under the excuse of political correctness. But attacking our children would be something that the terrorists wish they hadn't done.

The reason why this hasn't been done already I think is simple. The fact is that the terrorist raise far too much money here. Granted Al Qaida gets most of it's money from it's oil interests and jacked up oil prices. This is why they have attacked us already. But groups like Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah, get most of their money from like-minded small businesses owners from the middle east and masquerading "non-profit" NGOs and "relief organizations" here in the U.S. I'll give you an example.

Talal Chahine, owner of a chain of popular Lebanese restaurants,has been charged with concealing over $20 million in earnings, some of which they accuse him of sending to Hezbollah in Lebanon. It was under the cover of an organization to help orphaned children. But not just any orphaned children. These were children that were orphaned because their parents decided to be suicide bombers. I'd like to call them intentionally abandoned. Anyway, Chahine has met with and posed for pictures with the leader of Hezbollah Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah. I hope he goes to Club Gitmo for senitivity training and some book keeping lessons.

....And so it continues.....

Right under our noses.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060402.wblast0420/BNStory/National/home
Toronto Police seem reluctant to call this individual a terrorist. Looks like they are taking lessons from the F.B.I. on this one. On one hand I can understand. Who wants to live in fear? But on the other hand, I would rather live knowing what the situation is rather than living an ignorant bliss and not be ready for what lies ahead.


The OU bombing is old news folks, but still not something we should forget about. Just like every other attack on this country. DO WE NEED TO HEAR ANYMORE?? This pretty much all started wuth the '93 WTC bombings. People have completely forgotten that attack, and if they haven't, they seem unable to decipher the importance and meaning of it. If you put it in line with everything that has happened since then, it makes perfect sense!!!!!

Police also ruled that Joel Henry Hinrichs III just wanted to commit suicide as well (even though the investigation is still officially open). It was out side of a stadium of 80K plus people at a October '05 Oklahoma State University football game by blowing himself up with the same explosives used in Oklahoma City '95. He couldn't hang or shoot himself because he wanted to take people with him. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what is taking place here. Officials investigating the explosion said: "I believe he accidentally blew himself up," Sgt. George Mauldin said
Tuesday of Joel Henry HINRICHS III, the 21-year-old engineering student who died
in the explosion. Added Mauldin: "I don't believe he (HINRICHS) intended for an
explosion to occur at that spot (on a nearby park bench)." But he did intend for one to happen and I'm sure it wasn't OUTSIDE a stadium pack for a college football game.

Here is a link to the investigative asessment done by Doug Hagmann at the Northeast Intelligence Netowrk. Make your OWN informed decision. http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=129

The First.......

There is something to be said about our current situation in this country today. The politcal correctness that we put up with is painfully pathetic. This and the posts following are just random thoughts by me and possibly others......an INFIDEL. I don't claim to be an expert on terrorisim or intelligence gathering, but I do claim to fed up with the direction this country seems to be heading. There are millions of blogs out here, and if you happend upon mine, I'm lucky I guess.

This Dubai ports deal really had me steaming. 1st of all you have the hipocracy in congress (Hillary) voting against it, and then you have Bill Clinton advising DPW and the UAE government on P.R. moves concerning this same deal. So who is really paying Hillary? Who does she really work for? This incestuous behavior is what makes me detest politicians to the highest degree lately. Not to mention everyone keeps saying that they were going to take over 6 ports. Well anyone doing thier research will know that it's actually 21 ports they were going to take over including numerous military ports. Some people think they are a key ally over in the mid-east because they house big naval ports. Fine....let them be a key ally OVER THERE.

There is no reason to give up our ports. I belive certain allies deserve certain privilages. Britian would come to mind as earning the right to manage our ports. The UAE however, has a lot of explaining to do before they gain that right. Take for instance the UAE royal family / BinLaden hunting expedition in Afghanistan sometime in '99. Then director George Tennet testifed before the 911 commission in 2004 that he (in not so many words) would have....could have...made Bin Laden into jihad soup with a couple cruise missles. But in doing so would have wiped out 1/2 of the UAE royalty in the process which would have created a politcal shit storm that Slick Willy didn't have the time to deal with. So, before DPW even gets a remote consideration of the possibility to talk about the prospect of managing an inch of our ports, they should come clean about thier terror ties and who expects them to do that?

I no longer get my news form the MSM anymore. You can't trust these people. They will not report on terrorist training camps in the US and they won't touch the story of the OU suicide bombing in Oct. of 2005 either. The OU bombing is one instatnce where the MSM took the FBI at it's word and STOPPED INVESTIGATING IT. C'mon folks, when do you see that happen? Ususally the MSM is stepping all over themselves to discredit the "establishment" and the government. That is of course....until they have the same objectives which is to pull the wool so far down over your face that you can't be informed about what is really going on in this country.